English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolLa galeria de tipos y situaciones espigados en la prosa, en la poesia y en el teatro quevedescos muestra que el tema de la pobreza se revela como uno de los mas fertiles en relacion con su capacidad creadora — ingeniosa y conceptista— de neologismos y caricaturas. A la vez, depara multiples aspectos que armonizan con la misoginia cultural de la epoca y del propio autor. Como ponen de relieve muchos ejemplos resenados, la figura del mendigo se puede jocosamente asimilar a la de la mujer pediguena, mientras que en la vertiente masculina el pordiosero ambiciona una caridad de naturaleza erotica. En ambos casos, la relacion entre los dos sexos depara, pues, a la pluma satirica corrosiva de Quevedo la oportunidad de adaptar la figura del pobre a una vision rebajada y materialista del tema amoroso. Pero, incluso algunas reflexiones filologicas y morales dan pie a elaboraciones metaforicas ineditas de la figura o de algun accesorio del miserable. EnglishThe series of types and situations present in Quevedo’s prose, poetry and comic theater shows that the motif of poverty is one of the most fertile in relation with the author’s capacity to create both ingenious and witty neologisms and caricatures. At the same time, it offers many features that harmonize with the cultural misogyny of the writer and his time. According to the many examples collected, the beggar’s figure can be assimilated to that of the pediguena, while the beggar is looking for sexual charity. In both cases, the relationship between men and women offers to Quevedo’s satirical pen the opportunity of adapting the poor’s type to a materialistic and degenerated vision of love. Moreover, even some philological and moral comments encourage original metaphors of the type or features of the poor.

Figuras de la pobreza en la escritura quevediana