English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study aimed to analyze geometry content of math text books for first grade to sixth grade in Jordan, along with the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). The researcher analyzed the content of these text books for geometry subject, trying to ally these standards to (NCTM) standards. 21 standards determined and divided into four categories. Four categories ranged between not available to highly available reflecting inconsistency geometry content to some extent in accordance with geometry standards of the National Council Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). This result agreed with Gonzalezgomez study (Gonzalezgomez, 1994). Pickreign and Capps (2000) reported that more attention and professionalism should be applied when writing math curricula.

Jordanian Elementary Math Curriculum and Geometry Content Along With National Council Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Grades (1-6) as Case Study