English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Indonesia has been implementing a more in-depth decentralisation system encouraging village governance since 2014. Since then, village governments have been given more autonomy on governing village fund to further encourage village development. This paper aims to compare two forms of village (desa and nagari) in terms of the practice of village governance. Using Lowndes and Sullivan’s framework of neighbourhood governance, this study suggests all types of neighbourhood governance has been practiced in both forms. Although village government type is more significant in both forms, the social rationale is more significant in nagari because of the cultural aspect. Furthermore, this paper seeks to identify the potentials and challenges of village governance.  This is mainly based on the comparation of the implementation of village governance in both forms of village. 

The Practice of Village Governance: Comparing traditional form of Desa and Cultural Form of Nagari