English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

1. For an ontological reconstruction, the significance of juristische Weltanschauung as one of the original components of the law’s very existence (besides objectified embodiments) is definitely shown by the fact that institutionalised social existence, whatever it be, cannot but withstand those kinds of simplification inspired by the Newtonian outlook of the universe (reducing reality to casual intertwinement of causal series originated by things and powers directed at them), in terms of which we may and have to differentiate the ‘construction’ itself (as given from the outset) from its ‘being made to function’ as a complementation exteriorly and posteriorly added to the former by an individual purposeful or random act; albeit when we are considering social dynamics with social institutions at work, we are tempted to take simplifyingly the two above components as some bifactoral mechanics that has been organised into one single functional system. As opposed to the physical world, however, in the specifically social world exclusively kinds of phenomena (features and aspects) suitable to be reconstrued from their actual movement as their genuine subsistence can be thought as prevailing as having the specific quality of ‘social existence’. Consequently, the ontological status of the way the jurist approaches to law in a manner sanctioned by the approved canon of the profession–describing the kinds of intellectual operations he/she usually performs by referencing to the law and the actual ways in which real life situations are judged by justices in law (as if all it were a simple deduction from the law valid at the time)–is hardly more or else than what is called professional deontology. And this is

Judicial black-box and the rule of law in the context of European unification and Globalisation