English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In recent-day comparative literature, the term of mentalites juridiques is being used as the key through which the underlying basic difference between Civil Law and Common Law can be best shown. This term is to englobe the entire view within which law is conceived at all, is named and also put in whatever intellectual context. So it affords one of those paths or aspects for an approach that may be instrumental for a comparative investigation of legal cultures in general and the dilemma of their future convergence or divergence in particular.

Differing mentalities of civil law and common law? The issue of logic in law