English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This central topic for this article is a CJEU decision that allows for the study of the application of the principle of mutual trust and a child’s right to be heard in the enforcement of a decision ordering the return of a child wrongfully taken abroad. The article also looks at the jurisdiction of a requested court being able to refuse the enforcement the above-mentioned decision by reference to violation of its own constitutional principles or to the grave violation of the basic rights of the child. In the Zarraga case, in connection with the facts of the wrongful removal of a child, the CJEU came to face the issue of how to reconcile EU principles such as the principle of mutual trust with principles of procedure within the area of fundamental human rights, such as the child’s right to be heard.\u

The principle of mutual trust versus the child’s right to be heard