English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEn este articulo se determina la validez de contenido de un instrumento de medicion de derechos humanos en Mexico, a partir de los modelos de Lawshe (1975) y Tristan (2008). Se realiza una investigacion exploratoria, descriptiva, no experimental, bajo un panel de expertos, quienes valoran el contenido y la pertinencia de cada item. La razon de validezde contenido (crv) superior es de 1.0 y la inferior es de 0.143, ademas el indice de validez de contenido (cvi) es de 0.893, por lo que el instrumento de medicion evaluado se considera aceptable. EnglishThis article determines the content validity of a human rights measurement instrument in Mexico, from Lawshe (1975) and Tristan (2008) models. Exploratory, descriptive, and non-experimental research is carried out under a panel of experts, who value the content and the relevance of each item. The higher content validity ratio (cvr) is 1.0 and the loweris 0.143; the content validity index (cvi) is 0.893, so the measuring instrument evaluated is considered acceptable.

VALIDEZ DE CONTENIDO DE UN INSTRUMENTO DE MEDICIÓN DE DERECHOS HUMANOS EN MÉXICO