English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

My aim is to disclose a programmatic convergence between Durkheim and Husserl in three different levels, thematic, methodological and ontological. In order to do so, I will carry out a phenomenological reading of The Rules of the Sociological Method in search of some core ideas of The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology and of The Origin of Geometry. I will also show, in accordance with Cathesian Meditations, that the sociological method is, in as much as phenomenology, a carthesian way. Then I will explain that Durkheim’s methodological and ontological stances present the same circularity as Husserl’s in Marion’s analysis. Then I will put on view that the way in which Durkheim faces it situates him in the phenomenology of the natural attitude undertaken by Schutz. Finally I will illustrate how Durkheim, just as Galileo according to Crisis…, is at a time a disclosing and a concealing genius and that’s the reason why he lets go the best of his social phenomenology, holding to a thoughtless anthropomorphism and to metaphysical dogmas which he didn’t get to put into brackets.

La conciencia colectiva como “conjunto de fenómenos”. El programa de la fenomenología en el “Durkheim objetivista”