English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this article is to propose social inequality as a fact that is directly related to the lack of knowledge of the social functions of the library and specifically the political languages of reading that cross the institution. Although it is clear that reading, writing and oral practices (LEO), depending on the political language to which they respond, have a favorable or unfavorable impact on social inequality. It is also true that if we place these in an emancipatory critical political language they can serve as alternatives to the reduction of social inequalities promoting that the cultural device, library, of which they are constituents, serve an emancipatory objective. The theoretical developments are taken from the political language centered on critical-emancipatory reading proposed by researcher Didier Alvarez Zapata. However, this discussion raises a new political language, the de-colonial intercultural, in relation to the possibility that LEOs give to promote spaces of equity, participation, and dialogue.

forum revista departamento ciencia política/forum revista departamento de ciencia política

La desigualdad, un suceso no ajeno a la biblioteca: lectura, escritura y oralidad, tecnologías de poder como alternativas a la reducción de las desigualdades sociales