English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article focuses on state and non-state interactions that enable instilling indigenous territoriality in the political agenda, during constituency processes. Hence the interest in knowing, why did indigenous territories get instilled in the political agenda during Colombia’s 1991 Constituent Assembly? The working hypothesis argues that, via institutional coupling, some players take advantage of the political moment to link problems with solutions and so push the issue on the agenda. This institutional coupling mechanism hypothesis is constituted as of theoretical discussions about drafting a political agenda and as of the institutional set up where the players perform. The proposal is to have a methodology that does follow-up on processes, to identify the operating mechanism and the analysis of policy instruments to organize empirical evidence. Finally, the necessary and sufficient parts are screened and ratified for the mechanism to work. The same is true of the agencies unleashed within it. The discourse method to understand the trajectory and functioning of local public policies.

Los territorios indígenas en la agenda política de Colombia: entre apuestas estatales y reivindicaciones ancestrales