English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

La presentacion de trabajos cientificos a traves de un informe requiere de un armado que podemos llamar “anatomia de un informe” y una dinamica en su interior a la que consideramos “la fisiologia del informe” para que tenga validez y credibilidad, pero ?como se evaluan los trabajos cientificos presentados en nuestros congresos? ?Cuales son los criterios para determinar que un trabajo sea aceptado o no? El Comite de Investigaciones de la AAOT elaboro las grillas de evaluacion. El objetivo de publicar las grillas es poder contar con una herramienta objetiva de valoracion cualitativa y cuantitativa de todos los trabajos presentados en sus diferentes generos, que podra ser utilizada por los evaluadores de trabajos como elemento de feedback y como elemento de evaluacion objetiva, y por los escribientes como guia para el armado del informe de su trabajo de investigacion. ABSTRACT For validity and credibility purposes, the presentation of scientific publications in a report form requires a certain layout that we could call the qanatomy of the reportq, as well as the dynamics of it, considered the qphysiology of the reportq. But how are conference scientific publications evaluated? What are the criteria used to determine whether a report is accepted or not? The Research Committee at the Argentine Association of Orthopedics and Traumatology (AAOT) developed evaluation grids with the aim of publishing them to have an objective tool for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of all types of publications submitted. These grids could be used by evaluators to present their feedback, as well as an objective evaluation tool. Authors could use them as a guide to prepare the report of their research work.

revista de la asociación argentina de ortopedia y traumatología

Grillas para evaluar trabajos científicos. Un modo de objetivar procesos de evaluación. [Using evaluation grids for scientific publications. A method for objectifying the evaluation process]