English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Just war traditions may exist in Islam dating back to the history of Islamic political thought from the early Islamic empire. Accordingly, textual interpretation on the Qur’an and the Hadith, and historical background on Islamic holy war, would be inevitable in this study. This study is aimed at assessing the main principles of jihad, and comparing them with the theory of just war in order to grasp some commonalities, if any, and building argumentations whether or not jihad could be deemed as a just war. In order to sharpen the understanding of these principles, one case study of jihadist theory in Indonesian context will be applied and analyzed, notably Imam Samudra’s principle of jihad in his controversial book ‘Aku Melawan Teroris.’ Under the framework of jus ad bellum and jus ad bello, this study reveals that if jihad is seen as holy, just and sacred, no one will justified to commit terrorism and violence under the guise of jihad. In addition, using juristic and theological approach of jihad, this study finds that Imam Samudra, one of the masterminds of Bali bombing, is guilty of using some Quranic verses regarding jihad and abusing it to justify his attacks on the island.

The Deontological and Consequentialist Principles of Jihad and the Just War Theory in Indonesian Context: A Critical Analysis