English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Adsorption of hydrogen sulfide, methanethiol, methyl sulfide, trimethylamine, and ammonia on thirteen kinds of adsorbents (5 kinds of silicate, 4 kinds of activated carbon, and 4 kinds of zeolite) was measured by gravimetry, at 30 degrees C and 50 Torr, using an adsorption apparatus with a spring balance in order to find the most suitable adsorbent for the removal of these gases by dry process. The relations between the amount of these gases adsorbed (mmol/cm2) on the adsorbent and the surface properties or the porous structure were examined to clarify the mechanism of adsorption of these gases on them through surface pH, pore size distribution, and area of an adsorbed particle of these gases. Among the thirteen adsorbents, the activated carbon Nos. 6 and 7 were the most suitable adsorbent for methanethiol, methyl sulfide, and trimethylamine whose area of an adsobed particle (wrho) was larger than about 17 A2, and zeolite Nos. 12 and 13 were most suitable for removal of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia (wrho less than about 17A2). The amount of these gases adsorbed (mmol/cm2) on these adsorbents was mainly determined by their porous structure rather than by their surface properties.

Properties of thirteen kinds of adsorbents for removal of hydrogen sulfide, methanethiol, methyl sulfide, trimethylamine, and ammonia.