English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

ON PRECONDITIONS AND STAGES OF THE TRANSITION OF IE *s TO *s IN THE LANGUAGES OF THE SAT ǝ M GROUP Summary The data of the Aryan languages show that the process of transition of *s to *s- type sounds under certain phonetic (articulatory) conditions, which had begun in IE dialects of the Satǝm group in earlier times on the phonetic level, has resulted on phonological level in appearance of the opposi­tion s ~ s much later, after the Satǝm group had diverged into subgroups and even after the divergence of the Aryan protolanguage. The phonologization of the opposition s ~ s was proceeding in parallel, independent and not identical ways in each “branch“ (Indian, Iranian, and Nuristani — „Kafiri“) of the Aryan languages, and was closely connected with entire phonological systems of these languages. Some „systematic exclusions“ witness that phonological „ruki- rule “ was not a distinctive fea­ture of the separation of the Satǝm group from other IE dialects (as well as the Aryan group from other Satǝm dialects). The change of *s to *s -type sounds in position after *i , *r, *k, and — in various dialects — after some other phonemes (in most of the dialects, after *u and later, in Iranian, after labial consonants, etc.) was only a common Satǝm phonetic tendency that accom­panied (to different degrees in different areas) much more significant transformations of IE pal­atal (and in some dialects, palatalized velar) consonants. This tendency from the early times was often blocked up by processes of lexical, grammatical and phonetical analogy (different in various languages), which obscure the results of the „ruki- rule“.

К предпосылкам и етапам перехода и.-е. <em>*s</em> в <em>*š</em> в языках группы сатǝм

К предпосылкам и етапам перехода и.-е. <em>s</em> в <em>š</em> в языках группы сатǝм