English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this study was to compare the Direct method and the Friedewald formula method for the determination of LDL cholesterol in dogs. Blood samples were collected in 185 fasted dogs without sex restriction. Serum was extracted and levels of LDL cholesterol were determined by the two methods. The mean, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum values by the Direct method were 49.2 ± 16.7, 14.6 and 96.0 mg/dl, respectively, and by the Friedewald method were 65.2 ± 31.5, 4.6 and 184.2 mg/dl, respectively, with significant difference between the methods (p<0.05). The Direct method is recommended for determining LDL cholesterol levels in dogs.

Comparación entre el Método Directo y la Fórmula de Friedewald para Determinar los Niveles de Colesterol LDL en Caninos