English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

La interpretacion romantica del Quijote en el siglo xixvolco sobre la segunda parte de la novela el significado tragico y trascendente que acabo imponiendose en su lectura. Sin embargo, de forma aparentemente paradojica, la mayor parte de los criticos decantaron su preferencia por el Quijote de 1605 a partir de algunos nucleos esenciales de la concepcion romantica que tratan de esclarecerse en este trabajo. Palabras clave: Quijote, 1615, Romanticismo, Cervantismo, interpretacion romantica Abstract: The Quixote’s romantic interpretation in the 19th century developed in the second part of the novel the tragic and transcending meaning in its reading. Nevertheless most romantic researchers have paradoxically expressed their preferences in favour of the Quixote of 1605 according to some essential aspects of the romantic conception that we try to clarify in this paper. Keywords: Quixote, 1615, Romanticism, Cervantism, Romantic Approach.

edad de oro

Lecturas decimonónicas de la segunda parte del Quijote: una aparente paradoja del cervantismo romántico / Nineteenth-century readings of the second part of Quixote: Apparent paradox in the Romantic Cervantism