English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

espanolEste articulo analiza las aporias relativas al intento de conciliar en la Politica la virtud etica del hombre bueno con la virtud politica del buen ciudadano. Mientras la primera se caracteriza por el saber mandar en el ambito domestico sobre seres antropologicamente inferiores, la segunda se identifica con el saber obedecer al mando politico ejercido en la polis entre individuos iguales y libres. Por consiguiente, este articulo pretende dar respuesta a la siguiente pregunta: ?de que modo Aristoteles justifica que un individuo legitimado por naturaleza a mandar en el oikos acabe por verse obligado a obedecer en tanto que ciudadano de la polis? EnglishThis paper analyzes the aporetical form through which Politics claims to combine the ethical virtue of the good man with the political virtue of the good citizen. While the former is characterized by the ability to rule over inferior anthropological beings in the domestic sphere, the latter is characterized by the political obedience due in the polis to individuals that are equal and free. This article tries to answer to the following question: how Aristotle justifies that a man that is legitimized by nature to rule in the oikos can be required to obey as a citizen of the polis?

El zoon politikon y las aporías de la virtud en la Política de Aristóteles