English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) has been evaluated in the United States and Europe, however, there is little information from Japan. The present study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in Japan. In-hospital and follow-up costs of 25 consecutive patients undergoing SES implantation in a de novo lesion were evaluated. A control group for comparison was composed of 25 consecutive patients undergoing bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in a de novo lesion before the introduction of SES. There was no significant difference in resource use between the SES and BMS groups. Procedural cost (yen1,049,200 +/- 208,793 versus yen896,590 +/- 117,984, P = 0.01) was higher in the SES group than in the BMS group because of the higher reimbursement price of SES (yen378,000 versus yen258,000). In-hospital cost (yen1,202,891 +/- 208,793 versus yen1,050,280 +/- 177,984, P &lt; 0.01) was higher in patients treated with SES. Less target lesion revascularization (4% versus 20%, P = 0.2) in patients with SES reduced the difference; aggregate 1-year cost was not significantly different (yen1,479,481 +/- 284,343 versus yen1,463,640 +/- 495,803, P = 0.9). It is concluded that SES may be cost-effective even in Japan.

Cost Analysis of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in the Japanese Health Insurance System