English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Blood pressure and pulse were monitored throughout 24 hours in 13 middle-aged men using a sphygmomanometer with an automatically inflatable cuff. These volunteers were in part mistakenly believed to have a "mildly elevated blood pressure" (in the light of a conventional non-chronobiologic approach, involving time-unspecified spot checks of blood pressure). Within about 24 hours, blood pressures and pulse varied remarkably: the coefficient of variation extended from 6.9 to 14.9% for systolic blood pressure (SBP), from 8.5 to 15.4% for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and from 8.0 to 17.9% for pulse. By applying the single cosinor method (involving the least-squares fit of a 24-hour cosine curve), statistically significant circadian rhythms were observed in SBP, DBP, and pulse in all but 2 cases. In most cases, the timing of peak values was estimated to be in the evening for all 3 variables. Circadian rhythmicity accounted for up to 46, 30, and 42% of the total variability of SBP, DBP, and pulse, respectively. This marked circadian rhythmic variability is an important aspect of cardiovascular function.

Chronopsies assess the within-day variability of blood pressure and pulse.