English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Prospectively collected ‘Obesity Polyclinic’ database was retrospectively analyzed for the answers of the questionnaries fullfilled during the initial evaluation for obesity. After exclusion unavailable cases, the answers to the question ‘how do you describe your general health/well-being? i) excellent ii) good iii) fair iv) poor v) extremely poor’ each were categorized, and these groups were compared for BMI per se, total body fat content, waist–hip ratio, fasting plasma glucose, HOMA-IR, LDLC, HDL-C, TSH, anti-thyroid peroxidase, free thyroxine, hemoglobin, creatinine, transaminases, 25(OH)D, albumin levels. As a secondary analysis, the associations of the symptoms with the PWB were examined. Table 2: Anthropometric and laboratory comparisons of overweight/obese subjects based on their perceived general well-being

Clinical associations of perceived well-being in obese subjects: a focus on laboratory measurements