English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Th e article concerns the question of improper composition of the court in Polish criminal proceedings as grounds for quashing the judgment and returning the case to the fi rst instance court for reconsideration. It comprises the analysis of the delegation of a judge to exercise his/her duties in another court. In particular, the analyses focus on the regulatory framework for proper delegation of a judge to another court and the validity of such delegation. Special attention is paid to the validation of delegation documents improperly issued for the judge in the course of pending criminal proceedings. Separate considerations concern the notion of the so-called “additional judge” and “additional juror” as well as a judge appointed to the panel as a “replacement judge”.

Nienależyta obsada sądu jako przesłanka uchylenia orzeczenia