English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Th e issue of community participation in sentencing has already been discussed in numerous monographic studies in German literature1. What is more, guidebooks or manuals for lay judges sentencing in criminal cases are published in Germany, among others by German Association of Lay Judges (Deutsche Vereinigung der Schöffi nnen und Schöff en)2. A provocatively formulated main thesis of the monograph, which is limited to the question whether community participation (of a lay judge) in sentencing is an outdated element of a trial or a guarantee to discover the objective truth, evokes refl ection itself. A tool used by the Author to achieve this objective was to be, above all,

białostockie studia prawnicze

Harald Lemke-Küch, Der laienrichter – überlebtes Symbol oder Garabt der Wahrheitsfi ndung? Eine rechtsgeschistliche Untersuchung über das “moderne” Volksgericht in Deutschland seit Beginn des 19. Jahrhuderts Peter Lang GmbH, Frankfurt am Main 2014 (pp. 241)