English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Many mainstream conceptual models guiding post-trauma intervention have been developed, and are utilised in accordance with theoretical and professional orientation. In many of these models the response to trauma has come to be postulated as an internal phenomenon. Conceptually, the stress response has been separated from its original source in the external environment, and has been located in the individual (Hobfoll, 1998; Monnier & Hobfoll, 2000). Medical or pathologybased responses to trauma often highlight deficiencies in the traumatised individual, who is treated by the “expert” psychiatrist or psychologist, based on the needs the specialist identifies. In South Africa, an exception is the social work profession, where a developmental approach has been applied to South African policy and intervention since 1997 when the White Paper for Social Welfare was formulated (Ministry for Welfare and Population Development, 1997).

CONSERVATION OF RESOURCES: A PRIMARY INTERVENTION FOR CONTINUOUS TRAUMATIC STRESS IN SOUTH AFRICA: A CASE STUDY