English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Dutch simplex nouns ending in schwa have two regular plural forms, e.g.  bode-s/bode-n  ‘messengers’. This means that neither of the two allomorphs  -s  and  -n  is blocked. Such regular non-blocking is non-existent in the closely related languages German and Afrikaans. To identify the reasons for this divergence, the history of plural marking in the three languages is compared. Based on the historical observations it is argued that the doublets in Dutch are retained due to the output principle of plurals ending in a trochaic foot, according to which both  -s  and  -n  may apply without preference on stems with non-final stress.

Morphological non-blocking in Dutch plural allomorphy: a contrastive approach