English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The paper focuses on the question whether and how it is possible to correct ‘failed’ literary position-takings in the medium of the literary text. An analysis of the case of Michas’ Zarėcki’s postural strategies will show how such ‘failed’ position-takings come about in the context of loss of institutional autonomy in Belarusian literature at the end of the 1920s. However, analyzing the aesthetic strategies applied in the ‘re-position-taking’  Smerc’ Andrėja Berazoŭskaha  it appears that while ‘deleting’ and ‘overwriting’ his ‘failed’ position-taking  Kryvičy  Zarėcki only seemingly submits to the dominant ideology’s system and marxist literary criticism: Precisely in exposing conformist writing’s norms the transcribing text – on an aesthetic level – emerges as a skilfully encoded defense of literary autonomy.

zeitschrift für slawistik

Fehlpositionierung und Autopalimpsest. Michas’ Zarėckis Romanfragmente  Kryvičy  (1929) und  Smerc’ Andrėja Berazoŭskaha  (1931) im Kontext der Entautonomisierung des belarussischen Literaturfeldes