English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In a narrative text, sequential events are usually presented iconically, i.e. in the linear order of their real succession, cf. Caesar’s famous  Veni, vidi, vici  (‘I came, I saw, I conquered’). However, the strict chronological order can be broken, as in ‘I conquered after I came (and saw)’. The aim of the present study is to describe such non-iconic cases in quantitative terms on the basis of a corpus compiled from 85 most significant or illustrative works of Russian prose. First, the distribution of iconic and non-iconic cases in syntactic structures of different kind (e.g. with adverbial participles) is described; second, typical structures are analysed in which two sequential events are depicted in reverse order; third, possible motivations for violating the principle of temporal iconicity are studied: the length of clauses (Behaghel’s “law of increasing constituents”), the order of main and subordinate clauses (the Clarks’ “main-clause-first principle”) and the informative status of the clauses (Halliday’s “given-before-new principle” vs. Givon’s “task-urgency principle”).

Non-iconic chronology in Russian narrative texts. Its types and motivations