English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

According to their restricted receptive fields and input-filter characteristics, disparity-sensitive neurons at early processing levels of the visual system perform rather ambiguous computations; they respond vigorously to disparity in false-matched images and show multiple response peaks in their disparity-tuning profiles. On the other hand, the perception of depth from binocular disparity is reliable, thus raising the question as to where and how in the brain additional processing is accomplished leading toward behaviorally relevant disparity detection. To address this issue, tuning data during stimulation with correlated and anticorrelated random-dot stereograms (a-RDS) were obtained from 52 disparity-sensitive visual Wulst neurons in three behaving owls. From the disparity-tuning curves, several quantitative measures were derived that allowed to determine the response ambiguity of a cell. A systematic decline of response ambiguities with increasing response latencies was observed. An increase in response latencies of neurons was correlated with a decrease of the strength of responses to a-RDS. Declining responses to a-RDS are expected for global detectors, because an owl was not able to discriminate depth in psychophysical tests with a-RDS. In addition, suppression of response side peaks was increased and disparity tuning was enhanced with growing response latencies. These results suggest a functional hierarchy of disparity processing in the owl's forebrain, leading from spatial filters to more global disparity detectors that may be able to solve the correspondence problem. Nonlinear threshold operations and inhibition are proposed as candidate mechanisms to resolve coding ambiguities.

Hierarchical Processing of Horizontal Disparity Information in the Visual Forebrain of Behaving Owls