English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Interconnecting neuronal populations in the vertebrate CNS are typically not well matched in their overall topographic patterns of histogenesis and differentiation during development. One striking example of this mismatch is the retinotectal system of the frog, where the retina grows in concentric annuli, while the optic tectum, a major retinal target, adds new neurons at only the caudo-medial border. The retinal ganglion cell (RGC) terminals nevertheless form an organized map in the tectum during the period when the two structures are undergoing such disparate modes of growth. This led Gaze et al. (Gaze, R. M., M. J. Keating, and S. H. Chung (1974) Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (Biol.) 185: 301–330) to propose that the terminals must shift caudally during development. In the present study, we have directly tested the hypothesis of “shifting connections” by selectively labeling an identified population of RGC terminals, those at the optic nerve head (ONH), and determining their tectal projection site relative to a particular group of [3H]thymidine-labeled tectal neurons. With this double-label technique, we have found that RGC terminals from cells at the ONH move from a position rostral to the [3H]thymidine-labeled tectal cells to a position caudal to these same cells during the latter half of larval development. This represents a movement of approximately 1.4 mm across the tectal surface between stages T&K XII and T&K XXV. In addition, we have used electron microscopy and electrophysiology to demonstrate that the RGC terminals make functional synaptic connections during this period. This indicates that RGC terminals continually change the tectal neurons with which they form functional synapses during the development of the retinotectal system. We propose that such moving, but highly ordered connections can best be explained by a two stage mechanism for map formation, in which graded selective adhesions between cells in appropriate regions of retina and tectum provide the overall gross retinotopy of the projection, while competitive interactions between RGC terminals are responsible for the refinement of the precision in this system.

Retinal ganglion cell terminals change their projection sites during larval development of Rana pipiens