English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Positive Surgical Margins (PSM) in Radical Prostatectomy (RP) are considered an adverse pathologic feature [1-4]; however, their association with clinical progression and biochemical recurrence remains controversial [5,6]. Attention to surgical detail and precise preoperative tumor staging is essential to minimize the risk of PSM and thus minimize the potential risk of disease recurrence [6-8]. The likelihood of PSM is strongly influenced by the surgeon’s experience irrespective of the surgical approach. Numbers of PSM range from 16-63% in the available literature in the Benelux, and PSM-rate is higher in men with a more advanced pathologic tumor stage. These numbers show that there is still room for improvement [9-15].

Transparency of Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy in the Benelux