English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Pressure ulcers classified as Stage IV (according to National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel staging guidelines) [1] take a long time to heal, and may cause serious infections, such as osteomyelitis and sepsis [2-5]. Thus, they usually require surgical repair using a muscle or fasciocutaneous flap (according to International Guidelines). Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide) Gluteal fasciocutaneous flaps are commonly preferred, because they facilitate the preservation of the gluteal muscle integrity and muscle function [6]. They are also expected to provide better long-term results following the surgical reconstruction of pressure ulcers than the myocutaneous or muscle flap [7]. Traditionally, the gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation flap technique has been chosen for the reconstruction of sacral pressure ulcers.

soj surgery

Perforator Flap is Better Option for Sacral Pressure Ulcer Repair because of Fewer Complications: Comparative Study of 20 Perforator and 11 Rotation Flap Surgeries