English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This text seeks to present two absolutely incompatible theories about character. (i) One of them, called situationist, based on contemporary moral psychology research, maintains that there are no robust traits that define us, that there is the idea of character, and that all actions are determined by circumstances. The other (ii) presents a harsh vision of character from Aristotelian ethics, arguing that there is something that defines us – character – which, once acquired,  becomes unavoidable. Finally, the article indicates that there are passages in the ethics of Aristotle that allow an alternative reading to (i) and (ii).

O QUE NOS DEFINE? ARISTÓTELES E A PSICOLOGIA DO AGENTE MORAL