English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper we investigate whether the principle of weighing the appearance of good law effectively emerged in Mexico, with the constitutional reform of June 6, 2011; or, if, on the contrary, federal judges have always been obliged to apply said principle in relation to the suspension of the act claimed in the amparo trial in the light of the fundamental rights of judicial protection and due process of law in the field of constitutional procedural law. It also examines the relationship between these fundamental rights and the new principle of weighing the appearance of good law.

La ponderación de la apariencia del buen derecho, la tutela jurisdiccional y el debido proceso legal en la justicia constitucional de México