English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background  . The aim of the present study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of novel nickel titanium rotary pathfinding instruments.  Methods  . Twenty instruments were selected for each file system. A simulated stainless steel root canal, with a 90° angle of curvature and a curvature radius of 3 mm, was used for cyclic fatigue test of the ProGlider (#16, progressive taper: 0.02‒ 0.085), PathGlider (#15, taper: .03), and One G (#14, taper: .03) instruments. Statistical analyses were performed with oneway ANOVA (P=0.05). Post hoc Tukey tests were used to determine any statistically significant differences between the groups.  Results  . The ProGlider instruments exhibited significantly more cyclic fatigue resistance than both PathGlider and One G instruments (P&lt;0.001). One G instruments had significantly more resistance to fracture than PathGlider instruments (P&lt;0.05).  Conclusion  . ProGlider instruments had better cyclic fatigue resistance than PathGlider and One G instruments.

Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider, PathGlider and One G path-finding instruments