English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background stating the problem Breast milk is fundamental to the improvement of the infant’s immature vulnerable framework and decreases child mortality. The neonates who are not able to breast feed sustain prematurity after birth and at most danger of not receiving human milk.1 Mother’s own milk should the first choice for all neonates including preterm newborn children, when a mother’s own milk is inaccessible or hard to find for different reasons, the following best choice is donated human milk (DHM) as a protected option following World Health Organization (WHO).2 The utilization of donor human milk (HM) is expanding for high-risk babies, principally for newborn children conceived measuring <1500 g or those who have serious intestinal issues.3 In preterm newborn children, there are particular benefits identified with HM that diminishes fundamentally the danger of stomach related intolerance, necrotizing enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and retinopathy of prematurity. It has likewise a long-haul positive effect on cognitive development and metabolism and cardiovascular wellbeing at grown-up age.4 Along these lines, it is expected that better to give mother’s own milk if impractical at that point give DHM or milk sharing rather than HM substitute.5 The rate of exclusive breastfeeding, which makes no difference aside from HM until a half year of age, is 55% in Bangladesh, as per 2014 Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS), yet at the same time, 45% stays out of this which surge newborn child death rates.6 As indicated by the World Bank collection of development indicators, in Egypt EBF was accounted for at 39.7% in 20147 and in Indonesia, 42% EBF practices works on, as indicated by the 2012 Indonesian Demographic Health Survey report.8 Not just that yet all around just 36% of babies younger than a half year are solely breastfed, and in developing countries, poor feeding practices including lack of exclusive breastfeeding until the point when a half year and inability to start breastfeeding in the first hour which contribute to the deaths of 800 000 children under 5 years old every year.9 Furthermore, nurturing an infant in all-day occupation can challenge anyplace in the world. However, in Bangladesh, the rights mounted to work mothers lag way behind. There are around 3.6 million ladies employed in the ready mate garments industry alone, making it the single biggest employer of women in the nation.10 These mothers need to work extend periods of time, and numerous industrial facilities do not have creche facilities for young children to empower mothers to convey their kids to work. In this circumstance, they can stop or offer the surplus milk for their child or other people who can utilize it. Regardless of its significance, HM sharing is still negligibly explored in the scientific literature. A very few researches, researchers have accentuated the requirement for more research on HM sharing that features donor’s demographic profiles and their inspirations, sentiments, mentalities, and convictions concerning this practice.11 In perspective of the different psychosocial factors associated with HM sharing, the present study meant to motivate the milk donors about milk sharing.

Human milk banking can be an innovative approach for developing countries