English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Having experienced a strong centralisation during the 20 th  century, Australia is generally considered one of the world's most centralised federals systems, if not the most centralised at all. This applies especially to its financial order; 83 % of all public revenues are raised by the federal government, which transfers resources to the states and territories, often in the form of “tied” funding, thus restricting the subnational governments' spending autonomy and expanding the Commonwealth's competencies. In recent years, “vertical fiscal imbalance” has been a key issue in an ongoing discussion on reforming Australian federalism. Some adjustments have already been made, such as the introduction of a new goods and services tax or an enhanced intergovernmental cooperation via the Council of Australian Governments. Further reform proposals aim at strengthening these tendencies and providing the states with some guaranteed revenue share. Generally, Australian federalism has often proven its adaptability towards new circumstances and challenges.

Australian Federalism: a Polity of Shared Responsibilities and Divided Accountabilities