English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Critics have interpreted Don Denis’  cantiga Proençaes soen mui bem trobar  as a diatribe directed against Occitan troubadours who associated in their poems springtime  exordium  and song for love. Although some have considered the particular piece of the Portuguese king an aesthetic recreation of the  cansós  that rejected the  début printanier  cliché, in this contribution a different reading is proposed. Given that in the entire corpus of the  cantigas de amor  there is only one text by the Galician clergyman Airas Nunez ( Que muito m’eu pago d’este verão ) that unites spring, euphoric love, and lyrical activity, this article argues that Don Denis’ poem emerged as a polemic and ironic response to the eccentric verses of his colleague. From the proposed perspective, the king’s  cantiga  is contextually situated and understood as part of a series of texts that integrate the king and the clergyman’s metaliterary debate on the conception of love.

De amor y primavera: el debate entre don Denis y Airas Nunez