English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Based on the «  dialogisme  » theory developed by Jacques Bres, this paper focuses on the  pragmatic effects  produced by the use of Spanish verbal periphrases, particularly by the use of «  llegar a  + infinitive » versus «  venir a  + infinitive ». It also takes into consideration the characteristics of each auxiliary within the respective periphrasis. With the ongoing process of grammaticalization leading to periphrases, some spatial semantic elements are retained by the auxiliary and the preposition  a , which contribute to the utterance-construction. In fact, the respective auxiliary operates as an indicator of the type of relations between the major utterance (E) and the minor ones (e) convoked by the major utterer E 1 . The analysis of over a thousand authentic examples taken from two corpora of the database  Sketch Engine , as well as the classification of the verbs preferably appearing in the infinitive position allows a more precise description of both periphrases. By restricting the analysis to one « shared » infinitive verb ( decir ), we focus on different pragmatic effects, showing that «  venir a  +  decir  » and «  llegar a  +  decir  » involve a different type of argumentation. By choosing  llegar , E 1  indicates that it rejects the minor utterer e 1  without providing any rational arguments ; by choosing  venir , (a) E 1  indicates that it rejects one anterior (e) – effectively produced by e 1  – and introduced by « venir a decir » or (b) E 1  mentions it rejects a series of minor utterances by providing an exaggerated synthesis the verbal periphrasis introduces. It is a synthesis built by E 1  but presented as summarizing a series of minor utterances (e) attributed to e 1  utterer. The aim is to dismiss the other’s statements by summarizing them in a magnifying trait synthesis.

Les périphrases verbales « venir a / llegar a + V INF » et leur rôle en discours : une approche dialogique