English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

New Testament scholarship has proceeded throughout much of this century with little concern for and even less contact with the artifacts of the Graeco-Roman world. Writing almost half a century ago A. T. Olmstead observed, "During this generation in which archaeology was revolutionizing the classical world and Old Testament study, New Testament students remained virtually untouched". Surveying the same period of history Robert Grant noted of New Testament scholars that they were guilty of "Neglecting the concrete actuality of the ancient historians, of papyri, inscriptions, coins, and other archaeological remains," while all the time attempting "to advance learning in their field by reading one another's books". Many reference works, manuals and books that fall under the rubric of "Archaeology of the Bible" reflect a clear diminution of quality in the chapters, that treat the New Testament, especially those books other than the Gospels. These works show almost no acquaintance with germane corpora of archaeological materials. If they are treated at all, the photographs, site plans and bibliographies are often decades out of date. Although not everyone would state it quite so bluntly, the following quotation reflects a widespread sentiment about the perceived irrelevance of Anatolian and Aegean archaeology for New Testament studies, "Just as biblical archaeology inherently implies Palestinian archaeology, so early Christian archaeology refers primarily to [the city of] Rome". To date

Use, Misuse and Neglect of Archaeological Evidence in Some Modern Works on 1Corinthians (1Cor 7,1—5; 8,10; 11,2—16; 12,14—26)