English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We have examined the effect of composition on the Raman-active vibrational response of the Cu 2 (Fe   x   Zn 1− x   )SnS 4  and Cu 2 (Mn   x   Zn 1− x   )SnS 4  solid solution series at ambient conditions. Based on these results we were able to identify the phase boundaries of the respective kesterite-type and stannite-type structures adopted by these compounds as a function of composition. In the case of Cu 2 (Fe   x   Zn 1− x   )SnS 4 , our observations correlate very well with earlier reports. For the Cu 2 (Mn   x   Zn 1− x   )SnS 4  series, on the other hand, we were able to clearly pinpoint the kesterite↔stannite transition for intermediate compositions for the first time, indicating that Raman spectroscopy can serve as an efficient method for monitoring subtle structural transitions in these systems.

Effect of composition on the Raman response of the Cu 2 (Fe x Zn 1− x )SnS 4 and Cu 2 (Mn x Zn 1− x )SnS 4 solid solutions