English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The central thesis of J. HABERMAS’ logic of legitimization is the following: Legitimate social norms can be justified by argumentation independent from their psychological efficacy. ‘Justified by argumentation’ means that - under the condition of unconstrained communication - the underlying interest can in each case be proved to be a general one. Two objections can be raised against this construction: (1) Its own functional conditions are the reason for its failure and its ending up in a paradoxy: Legitimacy established by communication presupposes a society free from domination; such a society, however, can do without the whole process. (2) Several arguments suggest that HABERMAS’ universalist argumentation only rationalizes a particular interest previously set.

zeitschrift für soziologie

Diskurs und Herrschaft – Überlegungen zu Habermas’ Legitimationslogik / Discourse and domination – Reflections on the logic of legitimization in the work of Habermas