English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Besides listing several cases in which Latin divine names seem to stand for indigenous ones, i.e. to translate them, this article offers a comprehensive view of the various types of theonymic strings in which the name of a classical deity is, more or less explicitly, involved. It shows that those in which a classical deity is assimilated to an indigenous one actually constitute only a minor group while the majority just use Celtic words for describing the classical deity involved. There is also evidence of similar renderings by means of Germanic words. The article inquires into the social and historical constraints which prompted the three phenomena and proposes a very general relative chronology.

Keltische Äquivalente klassischer Epitheta und andere sprachliche und nicht-sprachliche Phänomene im Rahmen der sogenannten ‚interpretatio Romana‘