English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

No records exist that spell-out Assyrian military thinking in the 7 th  century BCE with respect to the defense of the country and in particular of Nineveh. An attempt is made to elicit a plausible defensive strategy for Nineveh, which integrates topographical considerations, preferences in military investments, and the modus operandi of the various armies at that time. Insights into Nineveh's defensive strategy and identification of the causes for its failure provide a framework for a coherent interpretation of Nah 2f. It is suggested that Nahum implies a defensive strategy for Nineveh and points to its potential failure as a means for establishing his vision of redemption (Nah 1,13) as a comforting possibility. Nahum reasons that Assyria could perish because its defensive strategy does not properly account for the change in the tempo of war operations introduced by fighting cavalry.

Nineveh's Defensive Strategy and Nahum 2– / I.O.S.O.T.-Kongress in Ljubljana 2007