English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

The article contests the view, which is now increasingly widespread, that the stories of the patriarchs and the Exodus were first combined in a literary composition by P. With examples from (I.) the non-Priestly Joseph-story and (II.) Ex 1 it is shown that already before P there were two versions of a narrative containing both patriarchs and Exodus. J incorporated the independent Israel-Judah-Joseph story, which ended in Gen 50,22, and continued it with Ex 1,8-12.22. In E, from whom the Jacob-Reuben version of the Joseph-story derives, Gen 50,15-21 was followed by Ex 1,6* (without »and that whole generation«) and 1,15-20bα (without »to Pharaoh« in v. 19). The two additions in Ex 1,6 and 1,19 were inserted by the (exilic) Jehovistic redaction. The Pentateuch redaction was responsible for Gen 50,24.26a (and other verses), while 50,25 and 26b are even later. Patriarchs and Exodus were therefore already combined in a literary form before P.

Die vorpriesterliche Verbindung von Erzvätern und Exodus durch die Josefsgeschichte (Gen 37; 39–50*) und Exodus 1