English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Arguing that the exilic or post-exilic dates proposed  for the Book of Ruth on universalistic, linguistic, canonical, and sociological  grounds are inadequate, some recent scholarship proposes to date, read, and  interpret the book against the social and intellectual world of pre-exilic  Judah. This study advances the position that the new arguments, though valid,  are weak and that a consideration of fresh perspectives and new data supports a  relatively late dating in the Neo-Babylonian period. Among topics restudied in  this article are levirate marriage, the redemption of inalienable land, widow’s  right of inheritance, late Hebrew vocabulary, orthography, and a consideration  of Naomi and Ruth as Neo-Babylonian widows.

Dating Ruth: Legal, Linguistic and Historical Observations