English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In 1926 Mordecai M. Kaplan proposed what he thought was a new interpretation of Isa 6. As interesting as is Kaplan’s demonstration that Isa 6 is not an inaugural vision, is Kaplan’s wrestling with his own inability to take seriously the prophet’s distinction between his point of view and God’s. A decade after Kaplan’s seminal study, Abraham J. Heschel published »Die Prophetie«. Here Heschel called the ideal Hebrew prophet  homo sympatheticus . Ironically, Heschel’s essential message was that the exegete should not be a sympathetic but rather an empathetic reader. Now that empathic listening is an accepted mode of listening, it is possible to correct the eisegetical flaw in Kaplan’s reading of Isa 6.

Mordecai M. Kaplan and Abraham Joshua Heschel on Biblical Prophecy