English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

named after him, while his counterpart walked with God. Lamech, the descendant of Cain, was an infamous murderer, while Seth's descendant fathered the righteous flood hero. In conclusion, those who claim that the two genealogies descended from one original tradition do so because of two similarities: some similar names and a similar order for those names. The evidence from the Near East has shown that these similarities may be the result of fluidity that took place because of close association. On the other hand, those who claim the ancestries to have originally been distinct do so because of many dissimilarities. While the importance of some of these differences is diminished by their possible fluidity, other dissimilarities cannot be explained in that way. These include the notion of a flood and inclusion of a flood hero in Seth's line, the inclusion of a final segmented generation with a female element in Cain's lineage, the Cainite contributions to culture, the exaggerated life spans in chapter 5, and ancient comments about individuals in each genealogy. The conclusion reached is that these genealogies were originally distinct but were associated together and partially conflated, a phenomenon paralleled in Sumerian literature.

Leviticus 1–7 and the Punic Tariffs: A Form Critical Comparison