English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Analysis of a range of Gnostic writings (the  Secret Book of John , the  Nature of the Rulers ,  On the Origin of the World , etc.) reveals that Gnostic interpretation of the Bible stands apart from other Jewish and Christian biblical exegesis insofar as it combines two formal features: (1) more-or-less explicitly articulated statements of scriptural refutation; (2) more-or-less sustained and elaborate scriptural rewriting. Other Jewish and Christian writings display one feature or the other, and a number of New Testament texts in particular (Gal 3:19–21; 2 Cor 3:7–4:6; Mark 10:1–12) exemplify early Christian refutation of Moses. Notwithstanding, Gnostic exegetes uniquely conflate the two features into a hermeneutical posture toward the Bible that may be described as sustained contrarian revision. While this posture constitutes a peculiarly Gnostic approach to Scripture (i. e., the Bible), it represents a conventional late antique approach to scripture more broadly conceptualized, which would include Homeric epic.

Characterizing Gnostic Scriptural Interpretation