English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

This article gives a comprehensive analysis of the phonology of Navajo verbs in Optimality Theory based on the leading ideas of Positional Faithfulness (PF) Theory (Beckman 1998). In particular, faithfulness constraints are segregated according to whether they target lexical or functional categories in the morpho- syntax, and the two resulting constraint types are employed in the analysis of the word domains created by this division. The PF analysis explains the ob- served differences between so-called conjunct prefixes, on the one hand, and disjunct prefixes and stems, on the other, which are classified in Athabaskan linguistics as func-cats and lex-cats, respectively (Rice 2000). PF provides a direct account of the structural disparities between these domains, as exhibited both by their phonological make-up and the occurrence of phonological alter- nations. These results distinguish the PF analysis from a plausible alternative employing Positional Markedness (Steriade 1999, Zoll 1998).

Structural disparities in Navajo word domains: A case for LEXCAT-FAITHFULNESS