English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Muller and Wechsler (MW Tomasello, 2003; Goldberg and Jackendoff, 2004; Jackendoff, 2011) that grammars should contain a phrasal component for certain constructions, such as the N-P-N construction” (MW (2) According to MW1 and (3) It also allows for some arguments to be expressed locally while saving others for expression elsewhere (partial fronting) and for the coordination of two or more verbs with matching argument structures (M&W, p. 2). The authors discuss a range of data from acquisition, psycholinguistics, and statistical distribution, which they claim “either fails to distinguish the two approaches, or supports the lexical approach” (M&W, p. 1). These points lead the authors to favor the lexical approach over the phrasal approach. M&W’s paper raises a number of important empirical, methodological, and theoretical issues surrounding the employment of the concept of argument

Lexical and phrasal approaches to argument structure: Two sides of the same coin