English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Our goal for this paper is twofold. First, we will provide an overview of George Lako and Mark Johnson's theory of embodied cognition and argue that it is a useful, ‘empirically responsible’ perspective for understanding the importance of metaphors and other cognitive models (e.g., frames, prototypes, metonymic models) in our thinking and understanding. Second, we will use and critically assess the value of the analytic tools provided by the theory in understanding the cognitive processes and models underlying our thoughts, beliefs, and actions. Specifically, we will use the concepts of metaphor, metonymy, frames, and prototypes as analytic tools to gain insight into the cognitive structures underlying the ideas and claims found in descriptions of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001.

Metaphors we teach by: An embodied cognitive analysis of No Child Left Behind